Coconut Oil
In a time of so many food villains, coconut
oil has undeservingly topped the charts again. While the Center for Science in the
Public Interest (CSPI) does great work, they have a totally misplaced
anti-coconut oil emphasis that I just can’t understand: Two ‘Thumbs Down’ for Movie
Popcorn.
Instead of bashing coconut oil they should, at
a minimum, add some qualifiers to their bashing then bash the actual popcorn
instead. Virgin,
unprocessed coconut oil is an incredibly healthy fat
source. It ramps up the metabolism and helps burn fat, not create it. It is
high in omega 3 fatty acids, decreases inflammation and helps combat heart disease and
cancer! It is anti-microbial and can
kill viruses, bacteria and fungi.
To read about the great benefits of coconut
oil, check out these links:
The Latest Studies on Coconut Oil
A
New Look at Coconut
Oil
Canola Oil
CSPI then goes on to give a gentle nod to
canola oil, made from the rapeseed plant. This article gives a strong rebuttal
to the CSPI recommendation: The
Great Con-ola. In short, canola oil is a highly processed, toxic, health
depleting oil. And…much of North American rapeseed is genetically modified,
which opens a whole other Pandora’s Box. GMO Compass reports the following
about Genetically Modified
Rapeseed:
GM
rapeseed has been grown in Canada since 1996. In 2007, GM rapeseed was grown on
5.1 million hectares, which made up approximately 87 percent of Canada's
rapeseed crop. GM rapeseed is grown to a lesser degree in the US and in certain
states in Australia.
All of
the GM rapeseed grown throughout the world is herbicide
resistant, which enables a more efficient and effective approach to weed
control.
A quick note about GMO Compass. They are an organization that was partially funded by the European Union (EU) but the EU is not responsible for the content. The website is certainly worth more exploration: GMO COMPASS - Information on genetically modified organisms. The most amazing part of this site that I have found so far is the listing of plants that are undergoing GMO testing: http://www.gmo-compass.org/eng/database/plants/. This database explains when and where the testing is occurring and the likelihood of use.
Corn
The
USDA reports that 60 percent of corn is genetically modified in the U.S. : ERS/USDA
Data - Adoption of Genetically
Engineered Crops in the U.S.
In addition to the concerns about it being genetically engineered, it can wreak
havoc on an unhealthy person’s. Corn feeds the yeast that is overgrown in the
body, causing increased toxins to be released, causing increased inflammation
in the body, which can lead to cancer, heart disease, injured brain function,
and so much more. Almost the entire American population suffers at the hands of
inflammation causing foods such as grains, sugars, and dairy. The widespread
amount if illness in this country clearly reflects that the American diet
kills.What’s the
Problem with Genetically Modified Food (GMO)?
The Physicians and Scientists for Responsible
Application of Science and Technology report many of the problems here: http://www.psrast.org/newsheadin.htm
Another problem that may be potentially
linked to genetically modified food is Morgellon’s Disease. Those afflicted report
crawling, itching biting feelings under their skin, with multi-colored fibers
eventually extruding from skin sores. The fibers are not related to any human
condition and are not killed by any parasitic medications. You can learn more
here: http://www.morgellons.org/. The
Centers for Disease Control has awarded funding to Kaiser Permanente to study
the disease.
Dr. Vitaly Citovsky, a professor of biochemistry
and cell biology at the State University of New York Sunnybrook linked
Agrobacterium, found in genetically modified food, to the fibers of Morgellons sufferers.
Dr. Citovsky discusses his work here: Morgellons
Watch » Clarification from Vitaly
Citovsky.
How is the U.S. Government responding? With
an insurance rate reduction (regarding crop damage) for farmers who grow GMO: This
link is to the Foundation for Biotechnology Awareness and Education, a pro-GMO
organization. http://fbae.org/2009/FBAE/website/news_08_08_fcic.html.
Here is a link from a safe food advocacy organization,
written when the pilot program to encourage GMO growth was established: Say
'bye' to BYE: Monsanto GM Corn to be subsidized by USDA ...
Insurance for injury and liability caused by
GMO crops is not of heightened concern in the U.S. and is treated as any other
liability issue. How are other governments responding to the insurance issue?
Here is a 2003 report from the Australian government discussing how injury and
liability were being addressed in other countries: Liability Issues Relating
to the Unintended Presence of GM
Crops ... This
paragraph is especially relevant:
Currently, Austria and Germany appear
to be the only major countries to have addressed liability issues relating to
GMOs through specific legislation. Both
these countries impose strict liability for particular types of loss caused by
GMOs. Under Austrian law, in the event
of an accident involving GMOs, the releasing company will be liable for any
harm to health, property, or the environment, and must return the property to
its “original” state. Companies must
also obtain liability insurance sufficient to meet their liabilities. German law imposes liability for injury to
property or human health “caused by characteristics of an organism created in a
biotechnological process”. German
regulations place liability at the “manager” level of the installation, which
is likely to expose GM farmers (as installation mangers) to liability exposure. German law also makes liability insurance
mandatory for GM operators.
Morgellon's sounded cool (no offense to sufferers) and I went to look it up. It's not clear if it's mental, though: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=morgellons&hl=en&btnG=Search&as_sdt=2001&as_sdtp=on
Posted by: Maria Droujkova | November 22, 2009 at 07:28 PM
Nice piece on GMO, canola and coconut. I was just trying to explain to a friend a few days back that coconut oil was good for him, but he wasn't buying it, largely because of this sort of junk science coming out of CSPI.
Posted by: Hart | November 23, 2009 at 01:34 PM